Twitter Weekly Updates for 2011-12-04

December 4th, 2011 by guest No comments »
  • This article is unbelievably offensive. Hey let's all dress more feminine so the poor men don't have to hit us. http://t.co/2mvoN81I @nimnom #
  • RT @tui_talk: In fact @nimnom if you think men hit women in NZ because women aren't pretty enough, isn't this an indictment on NZ men? #
  • @opalfox did you actually read the nineth paragraph at all? #
  • @opalfox "84% of ppl arrested for family violence r men..P'haps way to give men chance is for women to appreciate their own femininity more" #
  • @opalfox exactly #
  • @meganebs Miss @_vitamink is making a "never read the comments" necklace to sell that I think is very applicable #
  • RT @coleytangerina: Update on the Naomi Madelin "Slobs" piece – wellingtonyoungfeminists: http://t.co/VxdCsi2P #
  • @fivefoot3 @annabel_hm I've got some by Moreish to review – the one time I tried it so far it was great #

Powered by Twitter Tools

Kimi Organic Hydrating Facial Cream: a review and a chance for you to win!

November 23rd, 2011 by johubris 3 comments »

kimi facial creamA little while ago (longer ago than I should admit to, actually), I was contacted by Kim Girbin, the founder of Kimi Organic, a vegan-registered, certified organic skin care range and holistic New Zealand company, who sent me some products to try. I received two full-size bottles of the hydrating facial cream, and a sample each of the body wash and the face wash. I’ll be straight with you – the sample size didn’t really allow me to try the body wash at all (there’s a lot of me), and I rubbed half the face wash into my hair because the hotel I was staying in for work didn’t have any shampoo. What the? Exactly.

So let me talk to you about the facial cream instead. I really like it. Let’s take a look at the ingredients:

Chamomile ExtractSunflower OilShea Butter, Cetearyl and Sorbitan Olivate, Cetyl Alcohol,Vegetable Glycerine, Fragrance, Macadamia Oil, Avocado Oil, Guar Gum,Potassium Sorbate,Peppermint Essential OilRose Otto.  (certified organic ingredients are listed in bold)

I know what all of those things are. I could eat most of those things, so I feel pretty good about putting them on my skin. Although I don’t follow a vegan diet, I like that Kimi Organic is vegan-certified, and I appreciate the straightforward approach of their trees for life programme.

Of course though, what you’re probably wondering is what the cream is like. Despite ‘frangrance’ being on the list, there’s not really much of a scent to it, which is nice, just a vague suggestion of chamomile tea. It’s a runny consistency, which is fine, and initially when you put it on, your face might feel slick for a minute before it sinks in. But then my face feels impossibly soft, and also at the same time pleasantly tight – which I might put down to the peppermint, although I could of course be talking out of my ass. I feel like it makes my face glow a little. It is a very nice moisturiser to use.

But don’t just take my word for it! Since I got two bottles, I’m going to give one away! Leave us a comment telling us what pretty pretty pretty things you’re going to be asking Santa for this year, and I will draw one winner at random next Friday. Hurray!

I’m calling it: it’s summer

October 30th, 2011 by megan 1 comment »

Look, I had my legs out today and I didn’t need a jacket. That’s summer around these parts, so I am going to write this post and knock on wood, because if I don’t get to start wearing my nice summer shoes and dresses soon then I may cry.

 

The great thing about winter is being able to hide under layers of clothing and blame the wind and lack of sunlight for your pallid girl-from-Twilight complexion.  But those days are over, and now you may want to defoliate, exfoliate, and paint those toesies a pretty colour. If not, then you are going to have way more time than me this summer to make cocktails and organise pool parties. I salute you.

 

If however, like me, you wish to have a (fake) tan and just generally have an excuse to buy fun new things from our friends at Farmers, please read on.

 

Summer = tan. But tan = early death. So the first product in my summer arsenal is always fake tan.  I’ve used Piz Buin a lot, since my Mum used to use it and introduced me to it, but since the arrival of gradual tans things have gotten a lot more convenient. So much so that I don’t think I would trust myself to do a proper fake tan job now.  I’m currently using:

 

Now, the colour is good, it’s non-streaky, I don’t mind the smell too much, but the spray thing is useless.  I spray it into my hand and then apply (I paid good money, I will use it up).  So it might pay not to buy the gimmicky spray version.

 

In summer I also want to look well-rested and “glowy”.  Get ready for my number one product of all time (and not just summer, all year round) – I recommend this product 100%. It is:

 

This is the Maybelline Dream Touch Lumi concealer. It is wonderful. It brightens, it doesn’t crease, and it’s basically the best concealer I have ever used. It makes me look awake even when I’ve had five hours of sleep.

For additional glowy-ness, I recommend a good highlighter. This product is ridiculous, I know. But trust when I say that it does make a difference for night-time “yes, I look naturally fabulous” makeup. The one I love is discontinued (dang it, Natio) but for overall glowy-making goodness, I hear Mac’s Strobe Cream is good.  Someone try it and tell me whether I should buy it.

This summer has a very distinct beauty trend, which I plan to embrace whole-heartedly, even though I think beauty trends are dumb. Get the chapstick out girls and drink plenty of water because it’s time for a bright coloured lipstick.  My personal summer selection is:

 

Revlon's Love that Red

Rimmel Funtime Fuschia

 

Chi Chi Lah de Dah

 

Yup. Red, hot pink, and a lipstick that is bright orange regardless of the outrageously poor photo quality above.

 

We gotta look after the tresses and with my curly mop this is particularly important.  I already use Kerastase’s Ultime product which I highly recommend. It smells amazing and it is the reason I haven’t had a cut in 6 months and don’t have any split ends. Hooray! Summer is a great time to start using a good quality conditioning product as your hair gets pretty dry from the sun and salt water combo.  V05 oil treatments are really good too, and are super cheap times which is cool if you have masses of hair.

 

Finally, don’t forget the sunblock on your face AND your decolletage at a minimum, and break out the waterproof mascara because you never know when an impromptu after-work swim will happen. Have a FAB time this summer and remember that having fun and enjoying all the good stuff out there is what will really enhance how gorge you are!

Pink Your Sink II

October 5th, 2011 by johubris 8 comments »

Remember how we gave away some Sunlight last October?

New Zealanders are once again being urged to ‘Pink Your Sink’ and help raise funds for breast cancer research with Sunlight Pink Grapefruit Dishwashing Liquid.

With one in nine women in New Zealand being diagnosed with breast cancer during their lifetime, Sunlight is thrilled to be a Pink Ribbon Gold Partner of the New Zealand. Breast Cancer Foundation (NZBCF). Proceeds from every purchase of Sunlight Pink Grapefruit Dishwashing Liquid will go towards raising $40,000 to assist with breast cancer research.

NZBCF is the country’s leading organisation for breast cancer research and education with support for the Foundation vital.

Sunlight Pink Grapefruit Dishwashing Liquid has a gorgeous fresh and lingering citrus fragrance, getting your dishes squeaky clean at an affordable price. Great news for Sunlight lovers is that now you’ll see your favourite dishwashing liquid in a new larger 750ml value bottle.

So what are you waiting for? Pull on your rubber gloves and ‘Pink Your Sink’ with Sunlight Pink Grapefruit Dishwashing Liquid today – washing up has never been for a better cause.

Sunlight is proudly made in New Zealand and is available in supermarkets nationwide, priced around $2.99 for 500ml and $3.59 for the 750ml bottle.

This year, we’ve got three prize packs to give away, with each prize consisting of :

  • 3 x 500ml Sunlight Pink Grapefruit Dishwashing Liquid
  • 3 x 750ml Sunlight Pink Grapefruit Dishwashing Liquid
  • 3 x tea towels.
    Prize value: $65.00RRP

The prize pack has been designed so the winner can share their prize with two of friends, enabling them all to enjoy the product and do their bit to support the New Zealand Breast Cancer Foundation. So, you wanna win? All you gotta do is leave us a comment before October 15 and tell us what you most like to do in the sunlight. We’ll draw winners at random. Hurray!

Vanity sizing, or, WTF?

September 29th, 2011 by megan 7 comments »

Ladies (and possibly gentlemen?), there has been much demand for a well-researched discourse on vanity sizing.  I did some cursory Googling on the subject and read up on Wikipedia, so naturally I am now an expert.* My thoughts and feelings follow.

Vanity sizing.  Essentially, it’s the reason I have a top from Glassons circa 1998 that is a size 10, yet tops I buy from Glassons in the present-day are a size 6.  I hasten to add, I have only increased in size since I was a wee Megan, so clearly some crazy shenanigans are going on. But WHY?**

I have two theories:

  1. the clothing manufacturing industry knows that the media has told us that being bigger is badder, and is trying to make us buy more clothes by assuming that we’ll say “hooray! I am only a size 10 when my entire life I thought I was a 12. I shall now buy 17 items instead of just the plain black tshirt I came in to get”; or
  2. it’s an accident.  We are plainly getting bigger and bigger: see Elizabethan homes for hilarious midget-height doorframes. See also: increased seat sizes on modern aircraft. It stands to reason that fit models (the lovely ladies they measure the clothes on in the workrooms) are also getting bigger. Since sizing isn’t standardized under weights and measures legislation, it gets all crazy and out of whack as manufacturers try to adjust for the times.

Cynical Megan thinks it is number (1).  However, how FRICKING annoying is it when you go into a store and pick up your size, think to yourself “meh, who can be bothered with trying things on? I will just assume that I haven’t gained or lost weight in the past fortnight since I last impulse purchased a dress here”, and then get home and realise you could in fact also make a hat from the leftover fabric in the item you just bought/don’t think you can wear that dress because technically it has cut off the circulation below your waist? Very annoying, is how annoying it is. In fact, so annoying that it actually acts as a barrier to the impulse shopping that they so badly want us to engage in.  Sometimes I don’t have half an hour to faff about trying to find my size in things!

Maybe it’s (2). Maybe the poor clothing manufacturer people just keep making weird mistakes that oddly only make us think we are getting smaller? Kathleen Fasanella (a pattern maker) states that vanity sizing is a myth, here. It’s a good piece and I recommend you read it. Amongst other seemingly excellent points she states:

It’s best to understand the nature of sizing before we go crazy and adopt national sizing standards. People are so different from one another that it is an unreasonable expectation that our clothes should be sized uniformly. The day that we should only have one size “medium” across all manufacturers is also the day we should only need an identical dose of an identical medicine for an identical medical problem. Humans are unique.

She then gives the example of Western wear versus tutus. A person in the middle of the range of lady cowboys will most likely be larger than a middle of the range ballerina lady, so the medium (representing the middle) will be larger in the chaps and fancy Western shirts than it is in tutus. Makes sense I guess. Although, I don’t see why this is an argument for not standardising sizing. This just means that tutus in size M would be too small for mid-range cowgirls. Big deal? I’d be interested in your thoughts below, because I am pretty sure this will give rise to some Feelings about how our body image is manipulated via size tags and the media.

She also makes some good points as follows:

A medium to a manufacturer is a reference calculation of needed fabric purchases. Since the medium represents -statistically speaking- their average customer based on sales, the quantities of fabrics ordered are based on multiples of those measures … For this reason alone a manufacturer will not want to change the sizing of their medium because it directly impacts utilization of all their other sizes…

- and -

Another thing people drag out as evidence of vanity sizing is the “inflation” of sizing numbers, that because what’s known now as a size 4 was formerly designated as a size 16 (pre 1960’s) that this is proof of size inflation but that’s not true either. The reason is that old sizes were based on -yet another- arcane principle related to pattern making and sizes were designated based on something known as “scale”.

So, I basically am feeling her points and goodness knows I don’t work in the industry and so can’t really put together a reasoned argument to rebut this. However, I do have some unanswered questions:

  1. why on earth do sizes from the SAME company keep going down and down and down? Surely their customer base doesn’t change that much – is this purely an economics situation?
  2. why can’t they even get it right from one item to the next – items that are in the same store at the same time? I appreciate there are fluctuations caused by issues with changes in fit models or by new styles being rolled out…but really?
  3. And finally, how is it possible that things have evolved so radically in the past 13 years that a size 6 is too large for me (largely because I am on the petite side in the bust region) when I used to be a size 10?

I remain unsatisfied and suspicious. My research continues and, in what must be the most exciting news of your life, I will continue to post very short updates on what I find out.

 

 

*not at all an expert. Obviously.

**yep, 13 years later it’s still going strong.  In fairness, I think it’s 99% plastic and that stuff takes 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 years to decompose.

Let’s mix a print

September 17th, 2011 by megan 4 comments »

I put the word out on Facebook that I needed a blog topic, and the suggestions rolled in.  After strenuously analysing the answers choosing the one that would allow me to play on Polyvore the most, I announced the “print mixing is good timez” topic was a winner.

Disclaimer time: I am not a stylist. You might read the following and think I am blind and lack taste. That’s fine – these are just suggestions. Mixing prints in the way I suggest below is not for everyone.

The easiest way to mix prints is illustrated in my Polyvore set below:

Print mixing intro

The prints are all within one colour palette (in particular the black and white prints) and the total number of colours is just three.  Stripes and dots are the easiest prints to mix – in fact it’s barely print-mixing since these go together like black and white.

The lovely Rachel sent me a few pics of prints that she already owned as inspiration for print-mixing advice. The clear winner among these items was these pants:

They’re yellow plaid, incorporating black, white and red stripes.

I found the same pair on Polyvore and threw in some suggested tops, bags and so on:

Yellow plaid mix

Option One is the “corporate plaid pants” option.  Or “first date” option, since I couldn’t get away with these pants at work (saaaaaad…).  Anyway, a structured top and bag that match but borrow some of the colours from the plaid, and plain black bangles to have at least one common theme, and Bob’s your uncle.

Option Two is the “it’s cold outside but my pants are hot” option.  The jersey doesn’t match and doesn’t really attempt to.  Sometimes this is actually easier than making two prints “match”.  I’ve used the blue patterned scarf because there’s blue in the jersey, and then insisted on a yellow bag to balance out the pants. If I had the power to change the shoes, they would also be blue, and possibly suede booties.  In this case it’s the accessories that make the outfit work.

Finally, we have Option Three or the “cocktails at the Country Club” option at brightness level 5,000,000,000.  You would need to be a brave princess to wear this one. Again, I rampantly ignored matchyness, although I did choose this top because of the red element in both the top and the plaid.  This uses a similar approach as mixing block colours with prints (always find the colour in the print that occurs the least often, and wear that colour as your block). I would put this model in red or pink shoes.

In short, when print-mixing you need to be ready to WEAR it and LOVE it and OWN it. Do as they do at Prada:

High/Low Designer Collaborations – not my fave

September 5th, 2011 by megan 2 comments »

So. During last week I tweeted that World was collaborating with Number One Shoe Warehouse:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yes, that is a screenshot from my iPhone, I am a dickhead.

ANYWHOOZLE, as you can see I have previously had my heart broken my designer/chain store collaborations.  Saben is a wonderful brand that makes gorgeous handbags.  I only had one problem with their Warehouse collaboration: shit quality. I mean, I know I’m not going to get handtooled leather bathed in the tears of virgins for $59.95, but the materials were really terrible.  The bags looked incredibly cheap.  Against my better judgment (and keeping in mind the 12 month money back guarantee) I ordered one online. It felt yuck to the touch, which just makes no sense to me because I have bought and currently own several synthetic leather-look bags that really do feel and look like leather!

I also felt sad panda when Max collaborated with…someone (if you can remember, it was a NZ designer, please do pop it in the comments) but that was mainly because it just wasn’t to my taste/didn’t suit me.  There was a lot of draped satin and edginess, as I recall, and because I am approximately the same height as a garden gnome, it was not The Go.

Well, I love shoes and I love World (from afar) and I was willing to learn to trust again.  I went on the Number One Shoe Warehouse website, here and looked at the shoes. I am too scared of the might of World to borrow any images, so you’ll have to go to the website.  Things looked promising. I love Dusty Springfield’s hair, so maybe shoes named after her were a great idea, I mused. Or those Edie Sedgwick ones. Admittedly I have two pairs of summer sandals, but the red ones are really lovely. Ahhhhh. New shoes.

So, after brunch on Saturday I asked my boyfriend whether he would mind if I just popped in for two seconds at the Lambton Quay store to have a briefest of brief looks.  I literally just wanted to do a lap of the store and leave. Well, my first impression was “where are the shoes?”. There was very little signage in the window. Also, as it was 12pm I’d expected either a scrum of girls or an empty wasteland littered with abandoned boxes and one very sad little shoe all by itself.  Instead, there were a few people in the store as usual, one of whom was trying on a  veritable mountain of shoes (none of which were from the World collection).

The shoes were set out on a clean, uncluttered display and were the same colours etc as on the website.  I just…didn’t feel it.  I had absolutely zero desire to even pick one up.  They didn’t look shoddy (although there was no effort, in my opinion, to create any fanfare or specialness around them either), they just…were.  And after several days of deep contemplation, I know why.

You want cheap shoes? Number One Shoe Warehouse.  Need really trampy shoes for a Halloween costume? Number One Shoe Warehouse. Need shoes to glitter as per my DIY tutorial? Number One Shoe Warehouse. Are you going to France in midwinter and realising you shouldn’t wear flip flops in Paris because the French will judge you and you won’t get into Chanel? Number One Shoe Warehouse.

Want ambience, desirability and full on XXX shoe lust? NOT Number One Shoe Warehouse.  I’m sure lots of girls (and possibly a few boys) will have snagged a pair and will love them for ever and sleep with them on their pillow for several weeks, because there’s very little chance of getting World designs for $100 – $200 (except in the sales, and then only if you’re lucky). And I think there’s also a good chance that in approximately three weeks when the collaboration is sold out (if it isn’t already, although based on Saturday I will be surprised) I will regret not shaking off the Shoe Warehouseyness and buying a pair.

There’s just something not right about buying World from a place that smells like plastic and petroleum.  I think my “take away”, to use awful corporate bigwig speak, is that designer items (for me at least) need that extra cache to create desire. If they’re easy to get, and cheap, I won’t really want them. If World had put those identical shoes in their own stores, I no doubt would have walked past and then stuck my greasy little face to the glass to peer at them and make grabby hands. That’s as close as I would have got, mind you.

 

How do you guys feel? Does bringing designer collaborations into the chain stores strike you as a very good idea, or are you confused and tormented like me?

 

EDIT: I saw the PPP Twitter feed which led me to http://cleo.msn.co.nz/cleonews/8294110/bag-some-kardashian-style. Yes. Hannahs are stocking bags designed by the Kardashian sisters. How do you feel about THAT?

Stuff that’s better than I expected it would be

August 25th, 2011 by megan 2 comments »

Hi denizens of PPP-city!

My Mum sent me an email the other day with a suggestion for a blog post (which, by the way, I am always happy to receive).  She had recently purchased some opaque tights from our friends at Glassons and had discovered that they are A.M.A.Z.I.N.G.

I didn’t think I could write an entire post about those tights (although truly, they are great) but it did inspire me to write a post about things that are better than you’d expect.

The first things are makeup. Now, we pay a lot more for cosmetics in NZ than our friends in the Americas and Ye Olde Englande. I recently bought a Revlon nailpolish in Canada for $3.97. The same polish here is $18. So my grubby makeup-loving hands are always looking for a sweet deal. Sometimes it’s just not the same ordering from Ebay and you need a hit, like, right now, you know?

I think my top two surprise makeup items have to be BYS eyeshadows and ELF lipglosses. ELF gets a lot of play on Youtube, and it’s easy to see why.  While this ain’t no Chanel, the one I have is pigmented, not sticky (PET HATE) and lasts a decent amount of time. And, unlike Chanel, it costs less than $10. Wait for Bling to have a sale and it’s even cheaper. ELF also does eyeshadow brushes that don’t shed and do a pretty good job of blending.

BYS eyeshadows can be found at Bling or Glassons and again, are super super cheap. Good level of colour, however there is quite a lot of fall out if you don’t tap the brush properly. Just be ready to do a clean up. These really show their good side if you blend and blend and blend and blend, and I think they’re a great way to try new colours or looks without blowing tons of money on something you might not use again.

In terms of clothes, rather than recommending somewhere really horribly cheap, I’ll recommend a dark horse. Many moons ago, when I was a pre-teen/awkward teen Megan, I occasionally got clothes from Just Jeans and they were a special and much-loved item (thanks Mum!). Then, somewhere between 16 and 27, I stopped liking anything they made, ever. However, boredom will eventually lead me back into any store, and a few months ago I wandered into Just Jeans. Now I am at the point where I have put a ban on myself, because if I go into that store I will buy something every single time. And it’s reasonably priced! I mean, we’re not talking Jay Jays cheap but we’re not talking the laughable “we don’t realise we’re a chain store and our clothes are mediocre quality” prices you often sometimes see at Max*. I definitely don’t love everything in the store but it’s worth checking out, particularly as summer rolls in and our tolerance for boho increases exponentially.

Shoes. They hold a special place in my heart and BELIEVE I own some cheap shoes. Front runners at this time are the mauve suede heels from Rubi Shoes (in the back of Cotton On) that cost $15. The world loves those shoes and has no idea they were so el cheapo (well…I guess you guys know now). Generally however, cheap shoes are a false economy, because they feck themselves so quickly that you end up replacing them. The key is to find a balance between cost and quality, and I personally believe that Zensu, stocked at Hannahs, is a good balance. They don’t do very edgy designs but I do have a killer pair of stacked heel, bright orange, patent sandals that they released last summer (and which I wish I also had in the black). Unlike Hannah’s terrible Pulp line**, these last, and look good. They aren’t super duper Number One Shoe Warehouse cheap, but then they also don’t give you foot cancer. Just wait for a sale – there’s always a sale at Hannahs eventually.

Finally, undies.  A while ago, I bought two push-up bras from the good people at Cotton On.  They were on a deal, so I think they were about $15 each, which as you ladies know is BARGAIN TOWN for a bra. Naturally, I expected them to last about 5 minutes. I do use a lingerie bag to wash my bras, and I do have quite a few in circulation, but these have lasted incredibly well (and fit just as well as my much more expensive Bendon bras). I’ve also bought underpants from Cotton On during one of their deals and they are lasting really well too – excellent for bulking out the drawer so you can wear something nice even on wash days!

Do you have any items where you said “wow! That’s better than I thought it would be!”? Leave a comment and let the PPP kids know so we can try it out too!

 

*I’m just saying: don’t try to charge $150 for an unlined, polyester tunic dress. I can go to Glassons or Dotti and get comparable quality for much, much less.

**I have bought Pulp brand shoes before and every single time I have had to return them because they were unfit for purpose. Seriously – I think I tried at least four different pairs over several years.

De-douching the douchey douche ad

July 26th, 2011 by johubris 1 comment »

So, there’s a product called Summer’s Eve. It’s for destinking your stinkbox, of course. Because our vaginas are creepy and gross and unnatural, y’know. And in order to sell this product, Summer’s Eve thought it would be a good idea to take on some race issues as well. Oh yes folks, black and white and latina talking hand vaginas! Seriously, who thought that was a good idea?

But what of teh menz? They’re going to feel left out, right? Not if Stephen Colbert can help it!

New at the Pharmacy: SAX Cosmetics Creme Eye Definer

July 14th, 2011 by Selina No comments »

On a  trip to the pharmacy this morning for medication for a teenager who is suffering from the Worst Cold Ever I spotted a stand of cosmetics which was new to me.

The brand is SAX Cosmetics, and a quick Google search reveals that they are an Australian company – their website can be found here. In fact they are the same Australian company who make MIKI nails polishes, and The Body Collection body care range.

The SAX makeup range consists of the standard lipsticks, glosses, eye pencils, shadow pallettes, foundations, blushers, bronzers and concealers; and prices are very reasonable with most products being under $20.

Of course as a beauty blogger it would have been remiss of me to come home without something from the range, so I picked up a Creme Eye Definer in charcoal for $16.90.

This is a wind-up style eyeliner, but be aware it’s not retractable. So don’t be winding the whole thing all the way out – it won’t go back in! And then there will be tears.

The other end of the eyeliner is a densely packed foam rubber smudger with a wedge shaped tip. Frnakly this isn’t much chop – it rubbed off more than it smudged.

The eyeliner itself, as its name would suggest, has a lovely cremey consistency and goes on smoothly. I do have an issue with the name though – to me this shade is lighter in colour than I would imagine a charcoal to be. Which is actually fine by me, it’s this mid-grey that made me want to buy it because I don’t have any other colour similar in my (vast) makeup collection.

Here it is swatched on my arm; on the left drawn on in two or three swipes and on the right drawn on and then smudged.

I do love this colour. What I couldn’t get the pictures to show was that in certain lights there is an almost denim blue tint to it. I can see me getting a lot of wear out of this.

Despite its cremey texture this eyeliner seems to be pretty budge-proof after it has dried.

Finally, here it is applied quickly under my lower lashline and lightly smudged. I’m not wearing any other makeup in these photos. And my eyebrows need plucking. Please ignore them.

All in all I’m pleased with my purchase – good quality for a good price.

Has anybody else tried products from the SAX range? What did you think of them?