Review: Beauty tubes August 17, 2008
Beauty tube, wtf??? Well beauty tubes were first developed by Kevyn Aucoin, writer of the Making Faces make-up books- that is if you believe the lady at Mecca Cosmetica who told me so. And since being developed, the idea has spread to many cosmetics brands. And here I’ll review L’oreal’s version.

But first, ‘tubes’ in the world of mascara refers to the effect this new range of products has on each lash - it surrounds each lash with a latex-like substance, which thickens, lengthens, and awesome-ifies lashes. The tubes are apparent when you remove your mascara, at which time the tubes slide off the lashes using only water!
Check out the advertising and product claims here.

The above photo shows the L’oreal mascara (on the right) benchmarked against one of my favourite mascaras - YSL’s Everlong (on the left).
Good points about the L’oreal beauty tubes:
- It really does lengthen and fatten lashes.
- Leaves a ‘false eyelash look’, great for going out.
- Washes out in water cleanly, leaving no smudgey black panda-ing (if you are under the shower).
- Reasonable price (approx. $NZ30).
Bad points:
- It’s really heavy, and does clump lashes together.
- Not a natural look - I wouldn’t wear it for ‘everyday’.
- It takes 30 secs to remove if you’re using a cotton pad - that’s a long time. In fact it is quite difficult to remove using a cotton pad, and blobs of black remain all around the eyes. BUT if you shower to wash it off, it removes entirely.
Verdict: On balance, I still prefer my YSL for most mascara wear. The L’oreal is great for going out, when you can spend the extra time to apply (you need to apply primer & black) and to remove. But it is fussy to apply - I recommend having a lash brush handy to brush out the clumps. And it looks a bit ott for everyday.
For more info on new mascaras see this herald article about mascara.



